Agencies
Discussions over a global tax deal are ongoing well past a June 30 deadline and governments are now looking to a G-20 finance leaders meeting this week to make progress on a stalled plan to reallocate taxing rights on large multinational companies.
The so-called "Pillar 1” arrangement, part of a 2021 global two-part tax deal, aims to replace unilateral digital services taxes (DSTs) on U.S. tech giants, including Alphabet’s Google, Amazon and Apple through a new mechanism to share taxing rights on a broader, global group of companies.
The stakes in the negotiations are high. A failure to reach an agreement on final terms could prompt several countries to reinstate their taxes on U.S. tech giants and risk punitive duties on billions of dollars in exports to the U.S.
Standstill agreements under which Washington has suspended threatened trade retaliation against seven countries – Austria, Britain, France, India, Italy, Spain and Türkiye – expired on June 30 – but the U.S. has not taken steps to impose tariffs.
Discussions on the matter are continuing. An Italian government source said that European countries were seeking assurances that the U.S. tariffs on some $2 billion worth of annual imports from French Champagne to Italian handbags and optical lenses remained frozen while the talks continue, including at the G-20 meeting in Rio de Janeiro.
Top priority A European Union document prepared for the G-20 meeting lists finalizing the international tax deal as a "top priority.”
It said the G-20 should urge countries and jurisdictions participating in the tax deal "to finalize discussions on all aspects of Pillar 1, to sign the Multilateral Convention (MLC) by summer end and ratifying it as soon as possible.”
Meanwhile, Canada in July became the eighth country to impose a unilateral digital services tax, with Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland saying it was "simply not reasonable, not fair for Canada to indefinitely put our own measures on hold” after the June 30 deadline passed without a Pillar 1 agreement.
The U.S. maintains that such taxes are discriminatory because they specifically target the local revenues of U.S. technology firms that dominate the sector.
"The Treasury continues to oppose all tax measures that discriminate against U.S. businesses,” a U.S. Treasury spokesperson said in response to Canada’s move. "We encourage all countries to finalize the work on the Pillar 1 agreement. We are in active discussions on the next steps related to the existing DST joint statements.”
A spokesperson for the U.S. Trade Representative’s office added that the OECD/G-20 negotiations "offer the best path to address challenges that digitalization of the economy poses to the international tax system.” Smaller firms affected Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told Reuters at a G-7 finance meeting in May that India and China were hindering agreement on the alternative transfer-pricing mechanism known as "Amount B.”
This mechanism would apply to thousands of companies below the $20 billion annual revenue threshold for "Amount A” and aims to deliver tax certainty to these firms through an objective way of calculating tax liability, said Danielle Rolfes, head of KPMG’s Washington National Tax Practice.