Tribune News Network
Doha
Dr. Maher Abu-Munshar, an esteemed associate professor of Islamic History at Qatar University (QU), has explored a historical narrative that has intrigued scholars and historians for centuries: "The ant that killed the lion.”
The saying, popularised in the late 12th and early 13th centuries CE, revolves around the iconic figure of King Richard I, known as the Lionheart, King of England (d. 1199 CE), and carries profound lessons for all who wield power and authority.
This study was based on the analytical historical research method to understand the event’s preliminaries, course, and outcomes, as well as the reason for which this phrase was said and became known. The liberation of Jerusalem on 2 October 1187 CE, by Sultan Salah Al-Din Al-Ayyubi was a resounding event and a major shock to both the Crusaders in East and Western Europe alike. The Crusaders succeeded in exploiting the weakness and disintegration of Muslims by maintaining the occupation and control of Jerusalem for decades, dating back to 1099 CE.
The defeat at the Battle of Hattin on 4 July 1187 CE further emphasised the weakness and disarray within the Crusader forces. The news of this defeat was so devastating that Pope Urban III succumbed to the shock and died on 20 October 1187 CE. This prompted a swift response from Europe, leading to the formation of the Third Crusade (1189–1192 CE) under the leadership of King Richard I, King Philip Augustus of France, and Frederick Barbarossa of Germany.
Frederick Barbarossa drowned in the River Calycandnus (Saleph), which is a small river in Cilicia, on 10 June 1190 CE, while he was marching towards the Levant. As a result, his army lost control, his soldiers dispersed, and most of the German troops returned to their homeland. King Philip Augustus’s subsequent withdrawal from the campaign left Richard I to lead the Crusade alone. Richard’s journey was marked by both valour and controversy. His stubborn resolve and fierce temperament were well-known, earning him both admiration and criticism. His intense negotiations with Salah Al-Din, culminating in the Al-Ramla Peace Treaty on 2 September 1192 CE, highlighted his strategic acumen and determination.
Historical accounts paint Richard I as a complex figure—intelligent yet stubborn, brave yet imprudent. His initial conviction that Jerusalem was rightfully Christian property led him to a brutal siege of Akka, where he ordered the execution of approximately three thousand Muslim captives. This act, along with his victories at the Battle of Arsuf, showcased his military prowess. However, Richard’s realisation that force alone could not reclaim Jerusalem marked a turning point, leading him to engage in peace talks with Salah Al-Din.
The legend of "The ant that killed the lion” takes a dramatic turn with the story of a boy who, despite his youth and perceived insignificance, brought about the downfall of the mighty King Richard. On 25 March 1199, during a siege at Chalus Chabrol Castle, Richard was struck by an arrow shot by a boy, identified in various accounts as Pierre Basile or Bertrand de Gordon. The arrow, seemingly weak, was as strong as a missile.’ The king belittled his wound and thought that it was going to heal soon, but the wound deteriorated rapidly and turned into what is called gangrene. It caused severe pain that the king could not bear, despite his well-known strength and might. The King died soon, at the age of 41 years, on 6 April 1199 CE. This event starkly illustrated that even the smallest and most seemingly powerless can achieve what appears impossible.
The death of King Richard I at the hands of a mere boy (the ant) is a poignant reminder of the limits of power and the unpredictability of fate. It reinforces the perennial lesson that even the smallest beings can overcome empires and kings. The phrase "the ant that killed the lion” serves as a powerful metaphor for the underdog’s ability to overcome seemingly insurmountable odds.
Dr. Maher Abu-Munshar’s exploration of this historical tale not only enriches our understanding of the past but also provides valuable insights into leadership, power dynamics, and the essence of true strength. Dive deeper into this fascinating study and explore the lessons that history continues to teach us.