Tribune News Network
Doha
A new study by Qatar Foundation (QF) partner Georgetown University in Qatar (GU-Q) has found that the cost of a universal basic income (UBI) programme large enough to virtually eliminate poverty in the UK would amount to just £67 billion per year or 3.4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).
The study, jointly authored by Karl Widerquist, associate professor at GU-Q, and independent researcher Georg Arndt, is titled ‘The Cost of Basic Income in the United Kingdom: A Microsimulation Analysis’.
The study determined the total cost of implementing a UBI scheme whereby each adult is given £7,706 and each child £3,853 per year, paying close attention to the tax implications of the programme.
"The cost of basic income has been exaggerated because some authors focus on the total or gross cost, which is simply the size of the UBI times the population,” explained Widerquist. "This ignores the fact that, for most people, the additional taxes they pay cancel out the basic income they receive. So, the net cost for the net contributors is actually much lower—nearly one-third lower.”
Widerquist and Arndt’s research found that 70 percent of Britons would financially benefit from this programme. Therefore, Arndt explains, "This scheme would be an effective wage subsidy (or tax cut) for tens of millions of working class families.”
The number of people living below the current official poverty line would drop from 16 percent to 4 percent. Poverty among children and the elderly would all but disappear. Those remaining in poverty under the scheme, Widerquist and Arndt find, would be much closer to the poverty line than they are now. Thus, Widerquist says that this scheme would "virtually eliminate poverty in the UK.”
The study notes that the proposed UBI scheme represents only an 8.7 percent increase in total government spending, and that it could be entirely funded by diverting two thirds of corporate tax subsidies, leaving approximately £26 billion available for corporate subsidies.
With the world facing a global recession due to the coronavirus pandemic, UBI has become the focus of increased interest. This new study demonstrates that it is a viable recovery strategy applicable to the UK and other similar sized countries.
Widerquist is a professor of political philosophy at GU-Q. He holds a doctorate in political theory from Oxford University and a doctorate in economics from the City University of New York. He has researched UBI for more than 20 years. He is the author, coauthor or editor of nine books including ‘Basic Income Experiments: The Devil’s in the Caveats’ and ‘Independence, Propertylessness and Basic Income: A Theory of Freedom as the Power to say No’.
Arndt is an independent researcher with a background in economics and operations management. His research interests include the financial viability of universal basic income and the dynamics of social coordination.
Doha
A new study by Qatar Foundation (QF) partner Georgetown University in Qatar (GU-Q) has found that the cost of a universal basic income (UBI) programme large enough to virtually eliminate poverty in the UK would amount to just £67 billion per year or 3.4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).
The study, jointly authored by Karl Widerquist, associate professor at GU-Q, and independent researcher Georg Arndt, is titled ‘The Cost of Basic Income in the United Kingdom: A Microsimulation Analysis’.
The study determined the total cost of implementing a UBI scheme whereby each adult is given £7,706 and each child £3,853 per year, paying close attention to the tax implications of the programme.
"The cost of basic income has been exaggerated because some authors focus on the total or gross cost, which is simply the size of the UBI times the population,” explained Widerquist. "This ignores the fact that, for most people, the additional taxes they pay cancel out the basic income they receive. So, the net cost for the net contributors is actually much lower—nearly one-third lower.”
Widerquist and Arndt’s research found that 70 percent of Britons would financially benefit from this programme. Therefore, Arndt explains, "This scheme would be an effective wage subsidy (or tax cut) for tens of millions of working class families.”
The number of people living below the current official poverty line would drop from 16 percent to 4 percent. Poverty among children and the elderly would all but disappear. Those remaining in poverty under the scheme, Widerquist and Arndt find, would be much closer to the poverty line than they are now. Thus, Widerquist says that this scheme would "virtually eliminate poverty in the UK.”
The study notes that the proposed UBI scheme represents only an 8.7 percent increase in total government spending, and that it could be entirely funded by diverting two thirds of corporate tax subsidies, leaving approximately £26 billion available for corporate subsidies.
With the world facing a global recession due to the coronavirus pandemic, UBI has become the focus of increased interest. This new study demonstrates that it is a viable recovery strategy applicable to the UK and other similar sized countries.
Widerquist is a professor of political philosophy at GU-Q. He holds a doctorate in political theory from Oxford University and a doctorate in economics from the City University of New York. He has researched UBI for more than 20 years. He is the author, coauthor or editor of nine books including ‘Basic Income Experiments: The Devil’s in the Caveats’ and ‘Independence, Propertylessness and Basic Income: A Theory of Freedom as the Power to say No’.
Arndt is an independent researcher with a background in economics and operations management. His research interests include the financial viability of universal basic income and the dynamics of social coordination.